Is there a “standard” duration for a non-disclosure agreement (NDA)?

Monday, April 20th, 2015

Time flies 1200x234What duration is standard for an NDA?

No surprise – “that depends.”  There is no legal requirement for a specific duration.  The duration is completely up to the parties of the agreement.

That said, people think and work on year-based intervals.  Most frequently, the durations used for non-disclosure agreements are 2, 3, and 5 years, which are the durations of the standard term used in the EasyNDA agreement.

BUT – There’s more to the NDA than duration alone:  There is whether or not the agreement terminates after a predefined duration, and the “term” after proprietary information is exchanged during which confidentiality must be maintained.

Though some NDA’s automatically terminate after a specified period of time (in terminating agreements, this period of time is often referred to as the “term” of the agreement), it is not uncommon that some agreements never terminate (automatically).

This means there are two kinds of agreements:

  • Terminating, and
  • Non-terminating

Terminating agreements have an effective date on which the agreement starts, and a duration after which the agreement stops. In these terminating agreements, the duration of the agreement is often called the “term” of the agreement. The “term” of the agreement therefore, can refer to how long the agreement is in effect.

What can be confusing, is that the same “term” can also refer to the period of time after which proprietary information is exchanged that the receiving party’s duties of confidentiality continue – whether or not the duration of the agreement has passed.

For example, a three-year termed agreement may come to an end three years after the effective date; however, the receiving party of proprietary information exchanged on the last day of that three-year duration, or term, will CONTINUE to have a duty of confidentiality for that last exchanged information an additional three-years; again, the “term.”

Terminating agreements have a problem though.  The problem comes into play with trade secrets. Trade secrets are those bits of proprietary information that never lose their value – in fact, are priceless to the owner of the trade secret (think Coca-Cola formulations). If a trade secret is disclosed under a terminating NDA, then after the term, the receiving party is no longer under a duty of confidentiality for the trade secret. Trade secret protection is one of the reasons for using non-terminating agreements.

Therefore, a term-limited NDA makes sense only for limited-life information, e.g. marketing plans which will be used by the end of the term.  A terminating NDA would be an unwise choice for other types of trade secret information with longer-term value, such as recipes, processes, source code, etc. because the asset may need protection for longer than the term of the agreement.

Non-terminating agreements don’t terminate (duh) and are perpetually in effect as long as neither party takes action to terminate the agreement. Non-terminating agreements are convenient for parties that have on-going relationships.

The “term” of confidential duty for non-terminating agreements is the period of time after the disclosure of proprietary information once the agreement has been actively terminated.

For example, EasyNDA’s agreement remains in effect perpetually unless one of the parties terminates the agreement (which can be done within one business day of written notice). The term of the agreement can be set to 2, 3, or 5 years. This is the period of time after termination of the agreement that confidentiality of proprietary information exchanged must be maintained by the receiving party:

This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date specified above (the “Effective Date”) and continues until terminated by either party as provided in Section 9. Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement, each party’s duties with respect to the other party’s Proprietary Information shall continue for [ term of the agreement ] after the time of disclosure.

And can be terminated:

Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving one business day’s written notice to the other party at its address provided above, after which Recipient’s obligations to Discloser are limited to that Proprietary Information disclosed before termination,

Learn more on EasyNDA’s FAQ page.

4 thoughts on “Is there a “standard” duration for a non-disclosure agreement (NDA)?

  1. Rin

    So Coca-Cola uses a non-terminating agreement because its very survival depends on its recipe remaining a secret. That makes sense.
    Then, you write that “Non-terminating agreements don’t terminate and are perpetually in effect as long as neither party takes action to terminate the agreement.
    Does it mean that the other party can terminate the agreement and then reveal Coca-Cola’s recipe to the rest of the world? It is not the case, right?

    1. Crick Post author

      The “Agreement” and the “Confidential Information” are two separate items. The Agreement is what is written on the document: that the parties agree to exchange information that will be treated as confidential, and the definition of that treatment (not to disclose). The Agreement can be terminated, but the obligation to treat disclosed information as confidential is governed by the terms of the agreement at the time of disclosure. This is a point of negotiation. Some agreements hold the recipient in perpetual confidence. Other agreements release the recipient after some specified period of time after the agreement is terminated.

      EasyNDA’s Agreement, if terminated, releases the recipients, after a specified period of time (2, 3, or 5 years), from the burden/obligation of tracking/maintaining confidential information received during the term of the agreement a confidential:

      Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement, each party’s duties with respect to the other party’s Proprietary Information shall continue for [ 2,3, or 5 years ] after the time of disclosure.

  2. Conundrum

    Currently running into this, suspect that someone did the same to me.
    It does work both ways or at least thats what legal counsel seems to suggest, so if I took action because they used
    my research for their product without correct attribution then there would be a very large damages claim involved.

    Interestingly the latest work suggests that it might have applications for energy production as well as possibly
    progress towards a ToE (ie Nobel) so this is pretty important.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *